Best answer: just for the record, the categorical imperative is not equal to the golden rule kant actually pointed this out in his groundwork of the metaphysics of morals. Kant’s categorical imperative is a well crafted way to keep you actions morally in check the first law is an elaboration of the golden rule, making his law more useable and accurate the first law is an elaboration of the golden rule, making his law more useable and accurate. The categorical imperative, in kant’s view, is an objective, unconditional and necessary principle of reason that applies to all rational agents in all circumstances. Kant and the golden rule of course, is to conflate kant's categorical imperative with the golden rule and this will not survive close scrutiny (for . Kant’s moral philosophy proposes that practical reason in accordance with moral imperatives should drive right actions duty should guide right action acting according to what is willed to be universal law is the “categorical imperative” that should guide behavior.
The golden rule is a “law”, while the categorical imperative is the reasoning of the moral world as a whole in my opinion he is saying that the ci is more important than the gr, because the gr is only about you. A categorical imperative, by contrast, is something you need to do all the time: there are ethical rules that don’t depend on the circumstances, and it’s the job of the categorical imperative to tell us what they are here, we will consider two distinct expressions of kant’s categorical imperative, two ways that guidance is provided. The golden rule principle in an african ethics and kant's categorical imperative: a comparative study on the foundation of morality 1.
Kant's position, that is, has a wider scope than the golden rule moreoever, kant offers his ideas of a perfect and imperfect duties to bolster his account of moral responsibility if taken by itself, the golden rule is not a reliable rule. Post 'kant’s categorical imperative, biblical law and the popular notion of the “golden rule”' on amerikaorg realist conservative blog. Kantian ethics in relation to the bible the first formulation of kant’s categorical imperative says that your actions should be universal and be willed to be universalized this is similar to the golden rule presented by jesus, that you should, “love your neighbour as yourself” (mark 12:31) and that you should, do to others as you would .
1 they are similar in that they both propose a single rule for determining appropriate behavior towards others 2 they are similar in that they are both self-referential: a) kant anchors the categorical imperative in the willingness of the actor. Immanuel kant and the categorical imperative explained the concepts of good will, moral duty, summum bonnum and the five rules of kant's universal maxims alongside a brief discussion on how kant's theory could be applied to the modern ethical issue of genetic engineering. Kant's categorical imperative states that 'always act in such a way that the maxim determining your conduct might well become a universal law act so that you can will that everybody shall follow the principle of your action'. The categorical imperative, kant says, is the fundamental principle of our moral duties the categorical imperative is a command that tells us to exercise our wills in a particular way, and not to perform some action. Peter corning suggests that, kant's objection to the golden rule is especially suspect because the categorical imperative (ci) sounds a lot like a paraphrase, or perhaps a close cousin, of the same fundamental idea in effect, it says that you should act toward others in ways that you would want everyone else to act toward others, yourself .
4 the golden rule in kant and utilitarianism daniel berthold bard college from the vantage point of the history of ethical theory, there can be little doubt that in the modern period two philosophies stand out as by far the most important in. Kant's improvement on the golden rule, the categorical imperative: act as you would want all other people to act towards all other people act according to the maxim that you would wish all other rational people to follow, as if it were a universal law. So in that sense, kant did not think the categorical imperative was simply another version of the golden rule in the video, “the morality of murder” by michael sandel, he talks about moral reasoning, consequentialist and categorical. One of the greatest philosophers in modern history, immanuel kant (1724–1804), derived his first formulation of the categorical imperative in his groundwork of the metaphysics of morals .
What i really want to know about is kant’s “categorical imperative” – his version of the golden rule how he derived his ideas and what they mean to the bigger picture of society, politics, ethics, morality and human interaction. Kant's moral theory is is only one categorical imperative of morality, kant found it helpful to express it in several ways some of the alternative statements can . Therefore, kant created nothing new in the categorical imperative it is merely the golden rule in philosophic garband subject to the identical philosophical problems and, if the golden rule has been so spectacularly unsuccessful at creating a better world, it is inconceivable that a mere re-formulation of it could do any better.